Hist 105 final makeup exam will be held this Wednesday, Jan. 21, at 15:00 in TB 310, for those students whose names have been officially declared in the registration page;
KÜBRA ATİK
GÖZDE ÖNDER
BERKER UĞUR
SERHAT YILMAZ
Please email Melek Cevahiroglu if you have any questions regarding the exam.
The Final exam will be held on January 12, on Monday, from 15:00 to 17:40 pm. Each student must take the exam in the assigned room. Those students whose names are not on the room list will not be admitted to the exam in that room.
Mongol rule and successor states, 13th, 14th centuries
1. Mongol tribal confederacy under Genghis (Cengiz), the Great Khan, or Khagan (Hakan), 1206. Capital city: Karakorum
Conquests in China, Central Asia and Iran, Russia and Eastern Europe, Mesopotamia and Syria
Khanates: * Golden Horde in Russia * Ilkhans in Iran; Centered in Tabriz and Sultaniyya (Sack of Baghdad, 1258) * Mongol Yuan dynasty in China; Kubilai Khan (1260-1294);
Capital of the great khanate: Khanbalik (modern Beijing) * Chagatai khanate
2. Connections across Eurasia through the “Pax Mongolica”
Consolidation of global trade network; radical increase in volume of trade across Eurasia
Silk road, controlled and secured by the Mongol rule: creates space for the exchange of luxury goods, for cultural encounters between the Mediterranean and Asia, for the transfer of technology and science
Mongol decline renders land routes dangerous; explorations of sea routes to shape emerging early modern world
Timurid invasions, 1360’s - 1405
3. Mongol legacy
Cultural eclecticism and inclusivism of Mongol rulers across Asia; east Asian cultural forms travel west. Appropriations of local cultural forms by newly established Mongol polities
Genghisid notions of world rule: to shape notions of world rule in the late medieval and early modern Turco-Persian world, in the Timurid, Ottoman, Mughal empires
Hist 105 Review sessions will be held in the following hours:
January 7 Wednesday 15:00-18:00: NH401 (Melek Cevahiroglu and Banu Kaygusuz)
January 8 Thursday 15:00-18:00: NH105 (Umit Firat Acikgoz)
January 9 Friday 15:00-18:00: NH 102 (Ayse Tek Basaran and Ceren Abi)
Those of you who cannot make it to either of these sessions should get in touch with Seren Akyoldas (serenakyoldas@gmail.com), who has scheduled an extra session on 11th of Jan, Sunday between 11:00 and 15:00 in GKM.
-migrated west in late 8th c. -early 10th c. settled north of Samanid territories (around Aral Sea) -985: Seljuk (an Oghuz army general) breaks away from Oghuz leadership -late 10th c.: Oghuz conversions to Islam (“Turkmen”)
Great Seljuk Dynasty 1040-1194
Conversion to Islam by Turkic people in Central Asia:
-Influence of leadership on nomadic population -conversion of “200,000 tents” in 960s following conversion of Karakhanid ruler Satuk Bughra Khan Influence of Sufism (mystical Islam / tasawwuf) -emphasis on personal visionary spiritual experience -guidance of a spiritual master -organization into orders (tarika) -aim to gain experience-based knowledge of God Yasawi order of Sufism -after Shaykh Ahmad Yasawi, d. 1166 -supported by the Karakhanids
Kutadgu Bilig by Yusuf Khass Hajib of Balasaghun, 1069: -long narrative poem (over 6600 lines) -Introduces traditional Turkic and ancient Iranian concepts within the framework of mirror-for-princes
-Objective: to describe an ideal kingdom with just ruler, competent statesmen and happy subjects
Dialogue of 4 main characters as symbols of key concepts:
•When speaking of medieval China, Stearns et. al. elucidate the accomplishments of the Tang and Song dynasties, while speaking of reunification and renaissance in Chinese civilization.
Further Interpretations:
•Rise and Fall Paradigm
•Order Disorder Paradigm: understanding cycles
•Universalism and Localism
Rise and Fall Paradigm:
•Historians in general speak of rise and fall, unification or glory of states and empires.
•Patricia Ebrey in her “epilogue” to Cambridge Illustrated History: China (1996:333) says: “When history is viewed from the western edge of Eurasia, the natural patterns seems to be for civilizations and empires to rise and wane.” [...]
“When history is viewed from the eastern edge of Eurasia, a very different pattern emerges as natural and normal. There is no sense that younger civilizations supplant aging ones, but that civilization progresses through a series of yin-yang-like reversals of direction from excessive disorder to excessive order and back again.”
Universalisim and Localism:
Looking from the perspective of Asian history, however, we can speak of universalist and localists
Universalist Periods in the First Millienium:
In the period between 200BC to 200 AD we witness not only the rule of the first Chinese empire (Qin-Han dynasties) but also the rule of the Xiongnu in the north and the Roman empire in the west.
UniversaliSt Period Phase 2:
The second phase is between ca. 550-900. During this period we witness the rule of Sui (581-617) and Tang (618-907) dynasties in China, the Early Türk and the Uighurs in the steppe regions,and the Islamic and Byzantine empires in the west.
Localism (Phase 1): 220-550:
In the period between 200-550 many local dynasties rule all over Asia. There are too many actors, with different ethnic backgrounds. While western scholars concentrate more on the introduction of Buddhism to China, from the Chinese perspective this period is seen as a period of disunion and disorder.
Localism Phase 1 (200-550):
Therefore terms below are used for this period
Threee kingdoms
Six Dynasties
Southern and Northern Dynasties
Localism Phase 2 (900-1206):
The period between 900-1200 is full of actors. Song dynasty in China has been described as “China among Equals” by some historians. Again we have too many actors like the Khitan and the Jurchen, in the north, the Xixia in the west.
Universalist World Empire of the Mongols (1206- 1368):
The state and empire of Chinggis Khan (1206) brings an end to these alternating phases of universalism and localism in Asia.
These universalist empires were more inclusive, while the localist states were more exclusive. Each of the localist states –each being equal to the other-- were all living their own life and letting others live. Besides being exclusive and keeping to itself, the Song dynasty (960-1278) followed the patterns established by the Tang (618-907). This is why they are discussed together by Stearns et al.
The Tang as a representative of the universalist phase 2 inChina (618-907):
•
Tang Taizong (627- 649) The second emperor, as the ideologue and organizer
The Tang capital Changan, (present Xi’an) with north-south orientation
Funerary complex of Taizong: Zhaoling Entrance in the the south, leading towards the “ultimate” in the north
Tang statesmen as well as important foreigners who recognized Tang rule were given a place in this funerary complex
Zhaoling, a view of the mountain
Taizong’s horses
Two cultures in interaction:
Funerary Inscriptions among the Early Türk & Funerary inscriptions in China
Epilog 1:
•In this universalist period the culture being inclusive there was room for everyone. The interaction of cultures brought about a new understanding, new forms and new tastes, in other words a new synthesis.
•In the following localist period, each actor cherished his/her own qualities and characteristics
Epilog 2:
•This was not a period of expansion. On the contrary each one lived by itself accepting the right of existence of the other.
•In the words of Morris Rossabi : Song China (960-1278) was amongequals.
Continuity and Change in the Localist Period: The Song Dynasty
(960-1278)
I.Continuities
a.Improvement of patterns set by the Tang
1.urbanization
2.improvement of tools of political culture
i.domestic sphere
·bureaucracy
·examination system
ii.[foreign relations: a two sided rhetoric
·“China among equals” rhetoric for foreign consumption
·“Superiority of China and Chinese Civilization” for domestic consumption
iii. CRefinement in aesthetical patterns (see blow III.)
II.Changes
a.Shift from political to economic expansion
i.improvement and expansion of agrarian production
ii.expansion of commerce and artisan production
iii.expansion of sea trade
b.Shift from universalist spirituality to local philosophy
i.Revival of Confucian Thought
ii.Reinterpretation in literary criticism and historical scholarship: a renaissance
c.Reflections of this shift in spiritual and intellectual sphere to family and society : a society more inward looking
i.emphasis on hierarchy
ii.rise of mile dominance
iii.restrictions on women’s rights
·beginnings of the idea of women’s place is in husband’s home (in ancestral rituals
·foot binding
·beginnings of “no divorce” practices
·dowry also cannot be taken back home, contributes to the capital of husband’s family
III.Outstanding and Long lasting Accomplishments
·Refinement in the aesthetic sphere from Tang to Song, a continuous improvement of style and complexity of designs and techniques
·Refinement in Poetry
·Long lasting accomplishments in the literary and historical literature
·Invention of printing and spread of literacy
A comparison of universalist and localist patters in terms of international relations:
Crisis in Mid-Tang (753-759) was overcome with the help of foreigners, in this case the Uighurs (734-840).
·Cultural interaction created friends and allies rather than adversaries and enemies
·Localism emphasizing local values created the “other” which in many cases could be the enemy
·Today in People’s Republic of China, they are trying to ease out the “enemy” rhetoric from the textbooks by emphasizing “friendship of cultures.”